| |
Fury
(2006)--**1/2
Fury
is a film that aspires to be a bloody, sexploitation flick and
only gets halfway there. The half that does make it is destined
to make Fury a cult classic in the local film circles,
but what it has in terms of sex and violence is nowhere near
what the narrative demands.
Hell hath no fury, the old cliché begins. I’m
sure you know the rest. For Laney (Marie Madison), an aging
female professional, that saying was never as true as when she
fell hard for a twenty-something boy toy named Michael (James
Xavier). The rules were set at the beginning that it was nothing
more than a sex thing. Laney, however, goes crazy with jealousy
every time a woman is near Michael. The bodies begin to pileup
until we find out how crazy Laney really is.
It’s frustrating waiting for those bodies to pile up.
Through this badly paced exposition, expecting that something
will happen is the worst thing you can do. As you wade through
the film’s first half, it only gets tougher. The listlessness
is best illustrated in an Erie-centric credit sequence that
is too long, too uneventful, and doesn’t seem to exist
on the same planet as the rest of the film.
The acting, too, is out of this world. I rarely mention acting
when reviewing a production like Fury, but most of
the film’s problems could have been solved with a simple
second take. That’s not too much to ask at all from a
DV production. Lines are stumbled through, with blatant gaffes
like mispronouncing Perrier water or “all intents and
purposes.” Only James Xavier seems spontaneous and at
the same time practiced, which makes him a standout in a badly
acted film.
What is the good news? The good news is that there is enough
sex and blood to make diehard exploitation film fans happy.
The dialogue and narration at times feels like its straight
from an erotica book and is read like the actors are in porno
film, only adding to an image the filmmakers’ seemingly
intended to create. Fury appears to know its role unlike
truly bad films (I Spit on Your Grave or Soultaker,
for example), and that makes an otherwise excruciating experience
tolerable.
More bad news now. There wasn’t nearly enough sex and violence
too shock or amuse a broad audience. This isn’t a Troma
movie. Looking at the way Fury pans out, though, filmmakers
Paul Gorman and Steed Merrill could end up making a go of it.
They’re next project is House of Bedlam. If the
pair can take a little more time making their next film, then
we are in for a decadent, Eli Roth-style horror treat.
With the criticism I dish out above, I can a least suggest
the one thing that will make Fury into a great movie:
a drinking game. Drink every time someone isn’t fully
dressed. Drink every time you see a nipple. Do a shot when the
actors screw up a line. Oh, and chug for the entire length of
a Laney ramblings. That would make one hell of a night at the
movies. Considering that this film will be shown at 1 a.m. on
a Saturday night (Sunday morning), I would imagine most people
who are attending are already way ahead of me on this one.
| |